Check the answer
Correct answer
- BPredictive
The choice of development approach follows the product and the project context. When requirements are stable and known up front, the contract fixes price and scope, and the deliverable cannot be split into independently useful parts, a predictive, plan-based approach is the fit. A candidate who chose hybrid was looking for a middle way that the situation does not call for; a candidate who chose incremental missed that the unit has no value until it is complete.
Why, option by option - Question 1
A. An adaptive approach suits requirements that are uncertain and expected to change through feedback. Here the requirements are fixed by a regulator before work starts, so there is nothing to discover iteratively.
B. Stable, externally fixed requirements, a fixed-price contract and a single deliverable that only has value when complete are the classic conditions for planning the whole scope, schedule and cost up front and then executing against baselines.
C. An incremental approach delivers usable pieces of the product early. A chlorination unit that cannot be used until it is installed and certified offers no increment with stand-alone value.
D. A hybrid approach mixes predictive and adaptive elements when part of the scope is stable and part is uncertain. Nothing in this project is uncertain enough to justify the adaptive part.
Објаснување на македонски (explanation in Macedonian)
Барањата се утврдени однапред од регулаторот, договорот е со фиксна цена, а испораката нема вредност додека не е целосно завршена. Тоа се условите во кои најдобро одговара predictive пристап, каде опсегот, временскиот распоред и трошокот се планираат целосно на почетокот. Агилен или hybrid пристап има смисла само кога дел од барањата се неизвесни.
Where this sits in PMI
PMBOK Guide 7th ed., Development Approach and Life Cycle performance domain; Process Groups: A Practice Guide, section on tailoring and development approaches
Checked in two rounds by chapter volunteers; review by a certified board member is pending. Found a problem with this question? Write to us (capm-0023)